The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte GREGORY MAURICE PLOW and FARROKH E. POURMIRZAIE __________ Appeal No. 2006-3330 Application No. 09/922,196 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 27. In an Amendment After Final, claims 17 through 23 were canceled. Accordingly, claims 1 through 16 and 24 through 27 remain before us on appeal. The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for automatically inputting user information to an electronic form provided to a user computer from a server.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007