Ex Parte Plow et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                   
            publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           


                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                   

               Ex parte GREGORY MAURICE PLOW and FARROKH E. POURMIRZAIE                                      
                                                __________                                                   

                                           Appeal No. 2006-3330                                              
            Application No. 09/922,196                                                                       
                                               ___________                                                   

                                                ON BRIEF                                                     
                                               ___________                                                   

            Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 

            HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           



                                                DECISION                                                     

                   This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 27.  In an Amendment After 
            Final, claims 17 through 23 were canceled.  Accordingly, claims 1 through 16 and 24 through 27   
            remain before us on appeal.                                                                      
                   The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for automatically inputting user   
            information to an electronic form provided to a user computer from a server.                     








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007