The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MARSHALL D. CREW, DWAYNE T. FRIESEN, BRUNO C. HANCOCK, CHRIS MACRI JAMES A.S. NIGHTINGALE, and RAVI M. SHANKER __________ Appeal No. 2006-3379 Application No. 10/393,549 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before MILLS, GREEN, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to process for forming a pharmaceutical composition containing amorphous dispersion particles. The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated and obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We affirm-in- part. Background “Type 2 diabetes is often treated by drugs designed to suppress hepatic glucose production.” Specification, page 1, lines 5-6. A particularly effective drug isPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007