Ex Parte Chu et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                          
                       written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                              ________________                                                   
                          Ex parte JUDY CHU and JAMES GREGORY GILLICK                                            
                                              ________________                                                   
                                              Appeal 2007-0005                                                   
                                            Application 10/198,489                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                                        Decided:  November 15, 2006                                              
                                              ________________                                                   
                Before KIMLIN, PAK, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21-27 and 29-38.                     
                Claim 21 is illustrative:                                                                        
                       21.   An airspring comprising an air sleeve, said air sleeve comprising                   
                at least one reinforcement layer and a rubber cover disposed adjacent to the                     
                reinforcement layer, said reinforcement layer comprising a vulcanizable                          
                polychloroprene rubber composition and nylon textile fibers, said fibers                         
                having distributed over surface portions thereof an adhesive comprising:                         



                                                                                                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007