Appeal No. 2007-0028
Application No. 10/694,277
The references relied on by the examiner are:
Krause et al. (Krause) 5,590,285 Dec. 31, 1996
Templin et al. (Templin) 5,781,550 July 14, 1998
Wright, Jr. et al. (Wright) 5,857,201 Jan. 5, 1999
Brewer 6,657,999 Dec. 2, 2003
(filed Mar. 31, 1997)
Hoffman et al. (Hoffman), ‘‘IEEE 1394: A Ubiquitous Bus,” IEEE, 1995, pages
334 through 338.
Finlayson et al. (Finlayson), “A Reverse Address Resolution Protocol,” Request
For Comments: 903, Stanford University, June 1984, pages 1 through 4.
Claims 30 through 37, 42 through 46, 49 and 50 stand rejected under the
judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being
unpatentable over claims 1 through 15 of Brewer in view of Templin.
Claims 30, 31, 42 through 45, 49 through 60, 66 through 69, 73 and 74 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Templin in view of
Finlayson.
Claims 32, 35, 36 and 61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Templin in view of Finlayson and Krause.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007