Ex Parte Blyth et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                             ________________                                                  
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                             ________________                                                  
                                    Ex parte KEVIN GRAHAM BLYTH,                                               
                                     ANDREW RUSSELL GRAYDON,                                                   
                          JULIAN DAVID MARTIN and COLIN STEPHENSON                                             
                                             ________________                                                  
                                              Appeal 2007-0176                                                 
                                           Application 11/050,553                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                             ________________                                                  
                                        Decided:  December 8, 2006                                             
                                             ________________                                                  
                Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-13, 15, 16,                 
                and 18-25.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                           
                      1.  An auxiliary composition in particulate form for the laundering or                   
                treatment of fabrics, the auxiliary composition comprising:                                    
                      a co-particulate admix of:                                                               
                          (i) clay;                                                                            
                                                                                                              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007