Ex Parte Haataja - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0213                                                                                  
                Application 11/060,994                                                                            
                       1.  An article of manufacture formed from binder coated wood flakes,                       
                having a lopsided funnel shaped hole extending from one surface of said                           
                article to the other, said hole having one side portion extending                                 
                approximately perpendicularly from said surface and an opposite portion                           
                side portion extending from said one surface at an angle of 20 degrees or                         
                more with respect to said perpendicular, whereby said hole has a generally                        
                elliptically shaped opening at said one surface and a generally circular                          
                shaped opening at said other surface.                                                             

                       The Examiner relies upon the following references in the rejection of                      
                the appealed claims:                                                                              
                Akerson    US 3,143,026  Aug. 4, 1964                                                             
                Preston    US 6,569,540 B1  May 27, 2003                                                          
                       Appellant's claimed invention is directed to an article of manufacture,                    
                such as a molded wood strand product, having a lopsided funnel shaped hole                        
                extending from one surface to another surface of the article.  The hole has a                     
                generally elliptically shaped opening at one surface and a generally circular                     
                shaped opening at the other surface.                                                              
                       Appealed claim 1 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                          
                anticipated by Akerson.  Claims 2-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                       
                as being unpatentable over Akerson in view of Preston.                                            
                       Appellant has not set forth a separate substantive argument against the                    
                § 103 rejection of claims 2-5.  Rather, Appellant relies solely upon the                          
                argument against the § 102 rejection of claim 1 upon which claims 2-5                             
                depend (see page 5 of Br., last para.).  Accordingly, we will limit our                           
                consideration to the Examiner's § 102 rejection of claim 1.                                       
                       We have thoroughly reviewed each of Appellant's arguments for                              
                patentability.  However, we are in full agreement with the Examiner that                          
                Akerson describes the subject matter of claim 1 within the meaning of § 102.                      

                                                        2                                                         


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007