The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHARLES H. HONEYMAN, ELIZABETH A. MORAN,
LIBING ZHANG, ANTHONY EDWARD PULLEN, EMILY J. PRATT,
KIMBERLY L. HOUDE, MATTHEW A. KING, CRAIG A. HERB,
and RICHARD J. PAOLINI, JR.
____________
Appeal 2007-0217
Application 10/711,278
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: December 15, 2006
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 8-20, 35 and 37-
42. Claims 1 and 35 are illustrative:
1. A process for producing a polymer-coated pigment particle,
which process comprises:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007