Ex Parte Bunker - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                             ________________                                                  
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                             ________________                                                  
                                   Ex parte RONALD SCOTT BUNKER                                                
                                             ________________                                                  
                                              Appeal 2007-0285                                                 
                                           Application 10/064,808                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                             ________________                                                  
                                        Decided:  December 21, 2006                                            
                                             ________________                                                  
                Before KIMLN, PAK, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                 
                Judges.                                                                                        
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-31, 40, and 41.                   
                Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                       
                1. A fuel cell assembly comprising:                                                            
                          a housing having an inlet and an outlet and defining at least one                    
                bypass flow channel, said bypass flow channel being configured to be in                        
                fluid communication with said inlet, said inlet and outlet being configured to                 
                provide fluid communication to and from said housing, respectively;                            

                                                                                                              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007