Case Notes
In the context of the Hawaii workers' compensation scheme, a physician is an incidental beneficiary rather than an intended third-party beneficiary of the employer's workers' compensation insurance policy; thus, as physician was not an intended third-party beneficiary of insurer's insurance policy, physician did not have a cause of action in tort for bad faith against insurer. 114 H. 122 (App.), 157 P.3d 561 (2007).
[§386-124.5] Insurer's requirements; failure to maintain claims service office; penalty; injunction. (a) By January 1, 1992, each insurer shall establish and maintain a complete claims service office or engage an independent claims adjusting service as its claims agent in this State with draft authority for the processing and payment of compensation.
(b) Failure to comply with subsection (a) shall subject the insurer to a civil penalty of not less than $2,500, or $100 for every day during which the failure continues, whichever sum is greater, to be recovered in an action brought by the director in the name of the State in a court of competent jurisdiction. Any amounts so collected shall be paid into the special compensation fund provided by section 386-151. The director shall have discretion, for good cause shown, to remit all or any part of the penalty in excess of $2,500, if the insurer in default forthwith complies with subsection (a).
(c) If any insurer violates subsection (a) for a period of thirty days, the insurer may be enjoined by the circuit court from carrying on the insurer's business in any place in the State so long as the violation continues.
(d) The attorney general shall enforce this section if so requested by the director. [L 1991, c 78, §1]
Section: Previous 386-98 386-99 386-100 386-121 386-122 386-123 386-124 386-124.5 386-125 386-126 386-127 386-128 386-129 386-141 386-142 NextLast modified: October 27, 2016