(A) The department of rehabilitation and correction shall establish and administer the probation improvement grant and the probation incentive grant for common pleas, municipal, and county court probation departments that supervise offenders.
(B)
(1) The probation improvement grant shall provide funding to common pleas, municipal, and county court probation departments to adopt policies and practices based on the latest research on how to reduce the number of offenders on probation supervision who violate the conditions of their supervision.
(2) The department shall adopt rules for the distribution of the probation improvement grant, including the formula for the allocation of the subsidy based on the number of offenders placed on probation annually in each jurisdiction.
(C)
(1) The probation incentive grant shall provide a performance-based level of funding to common pleas, municipal, and county court probation departments that are successful in reducing the number of offenders on probation supervision whose terms of supervision are revoked.
(2) The department shall calculate annually any cost savings realized by the state from a reduction in the percentage of people who are incarcerated because their terms of supervised probation were revoked. The cost savings estimate shall be calculated for each jurisdiction served by the probation department eligible for a grant under this section and be based on the difference from fiscal year 2010 and the fiscal year under examination.
(3) The department shall adopt rules that specify the subsidy amount to be appropriated to common pleas, municipal, and county court probation departments that successfully reduce the percentage of people on probation who are incarcerated because their terms of supervision are revoked.
(D) The following stipulations apply to both the probation improvement grant and the probation incentive grant:
(1) In order to be eligible for the probation improvement grant and the probation incentive grant, common pleas, municipal, and county courts must satisfy all requirements under sections 2301.27 and 2301.30 of the Revised Code . Except for sentencing decisions made by a court when use of the risk assessment tool is discretionary, in order to be eligible for the probation improvement grant and the probation incentive grant, a court must utilize the single validated risk assessment tool selected by the department of rehabilitation and correction under section 5120.114 of the Revised Code.
(2) The department may deny a subsidy under this section to any applicant if the applicant fails to comply with the terms of any agreement entered into pursuant to any of the provisions of this section.
(3) The department shall evaluate or provide for the evaluation of the policies, practices, and programs the common pleas, municipal, or county court probation departments utilize with the programs of subsidies established under this section and establish means of measuring their effectiveness.
(4) The department shall specify the policies, practices, and programs for which common pleas, municipal, or county court probation departments may use the program subsidy and shall establish minimum standards of quality and efficiency that recipients of the subsidy must follow. The department shall give priority to supporting evidence-based policies and practices, as defined by the department.
Amended by 129th General AssemblyFile No.131, SB 337, §1, eff. 9/28/2012.
Amended by 129th General AssemblyFile No.127, HB 487, §101.01, eff. 9/10/2012.
Added by 129th General AssemblyFile No.29, HB 86, §1, eff. 9/30/2011.
Note: This section is set out twice. See also §5149.3111, effective until 9/28/2012.
Section: Previous 5149.21 5149.22 5149.23 5149.24 5149.30 5149.31 5149.311 5149.311-2 5149.32 5149.33 5149.34 5149.35 5149.36 5149.37 NextLast modified: October 10, 2016