- 12 -
investigated the Sentinel EPE recyclers or knew anything about
their value. Petitioner essentially argues that he reasonably
relied on the purported value of the Sentinel EPE recyclers set
out in the offering memorandum and on the statements made by or
on behalf of the promoters.
Under some circumstances a taxpayer may avoid liability for
the additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) if
reasonable reliance on a competent professional adviser is shown.
Freytag v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 849, 888 (1987), affd. 904 F.2d
1011 (5th Cir. 1990), affd. 501 U.S. 868 (1991). Reliance on
professional advice, standing alone, is not an absolute defense
to negligence, but rather a factor to be considered. Id. In
order for reliance on professional advice to excuse a taxpayer
from the negligence additions to tax, the reliance must be
reasonable, in good faith, and based upon full disclosure. Id.;
see Weis v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 473, 487 (1990); Ewing v.
Commissioner, 91 T.C. 396, 423-424 (1988), affd. without
published opinion 940 F.2d 1534 (9th Cir. 1991); Pritchett v.
Commissioner, 63 T.C. 149, 174-175 (1974).
Reliance on representations by insiders, promoters, or
offering materials has been held an inadequate defense to
negligence. LaVerne v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 637, 652-653
(1990), affd. without published opinion 956 F.2d 274 (9th Cir.
1992), affd. without published opinion sub nom. Cowles v.
Commissioner, 949 F.2d 401 (10th Cir. 1991); Marine v.
Commissioner, 92 T.C. 958, 992-993 (1989), affd. without
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011