Robert H. Avellini - Page 15

                                                - 15 -                                                  
            and the Sentinel EPE recyclers considered in this case, are the                             
            same transaction and machines considered in Provizer.                                       
            Issue 1.  Resolution of Questions Concerning Petitioner's                                   
            Investment in Efron Investors II for 1982.                                                  
                  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined a                                  
            deficiency in petitioner's 1982 Federal income tax in the amount                            
            of $4,502.  The deficiency for 1982 resulted from respondent's                              
            examination results with respect to the 1982 partnership return                             
            of Efron II and the consequent adjustment of petitioner's claimed                           
            deductions from Efron II in the amount of $10,248.                                          
                  Prior to trial, the parties undertook to reach an agreement                           
            as to a portion of the Efron II investment concerning a shopping                            
            center.  Respondent's attorney in charge of that issue prepared a                           
            proposed stipulation of agreed adjustments; petitioner's counsel                            
            signed it; the attorney who prepared the document also signed it                            
            and forwarded it to counsel for respondent in charge of the                                 
            plastics recycling issues for review and coordination.  That                                
            counsel for respondent disapproved a portion of the proposed                                
            stipulation as subject to misinterpretation and the original of                             
            the proposed stipulation never was delivered to petitioner's                                
            counsel or submitted to this Court.                                                         
                  Petitioner has filed a motion, which the Court has                                    
            designated as petitioner's motion to reopen record, in which                                
            petitioner urges that respondent be required to produce the                                 
            proposed stipulation of agreed adjustments and that the Court                               





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011