Evert E. and Eva F. Berglund - Page 11

                                                - 11 -                                                  
            Issue 1. Sale of Farmland                                                                   
                  Section 61(a) broadly defines gross income as "all income                             
            from whatever source derived".  Section 61(a)(3) provides further                           
            that gross income specifically includes gains derived from                                  
            dealing in property.  The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that                            
            Congress, in broadly defining gross income, intended to tax all                             
            gains except those specifically exempted.  Commissioner v.                                  
            Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955).  Section 1.61-6(a),                                
            Income Tax Regs., provides that unless specifically excluded by                             
            law, gains realized on the sale of property are included in gross                           
            income.  Generally, gain is the excess of the amount realized                               
            over the adjusted basis for the property sold.  Sec. 1001(a).                               
            The specific rules for computing the amount of gain or loss are                             
            contained in section 1001 and the regulations thereunder.                                   
                  Petitioner did not offer any proof that the preceding                                 
            recitation of the facts surrounding this case is incorrect.  On                             
            August 4, 1983, petitioner, petitioner's spouse, and their                                  
            daughter and son-in-law executed a $927,862.21 promissory note in                           
            favor of FNB.  They gave, among other things, a mortgage on both                            
            the Illinois farmland and the Indiana farmland owned by                                     
            petitioner and his spouse.  Thereafter, petitioner and his spouse                           
            defaulted on this promissory note in favor of FNB as well as the                            
            notes held by the senior lienholders on the Illinois farmland.                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011