Greta Ann Clifton - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               1 50 percent of the interest due on the portion of the                 
          underpayment attributable to negligence.                                    
               After concessions,1 the issues for decision are:  (1)                  
          Whether petitioner had unreported Schedule C income.  We hold               
          that she did to the extent set out below.  (2) Whether petitioner           
          may deduct claimed Schedule C expenses in excess of the amounts             
          allowed by respondent.  We hold that she may not except as set              
          out below.  (3) Whether petitioner may deduct  claimed employee             
          business expenses.  We hold that she may not.  (4) Whether                  
          petitioner may deduct a claimed capital loss.  We hold that she             
          may not.  (5) Whether petitioner had additional self employment             
          income.  We hold that she did.  (6) Whether petitioner is liable            
          for the additions to tax for negligence under section 6653(a)(1)            
          (2).2  We hold that she is liable.  (7) Whether petitioner is               
          liable for an addition to tax for substantial understatement of             
          tax under section 6661(a).  We hold that she is liable.                     

          1  Respondent conceded that petitioner is allowed Schedule C                
          deductions of $2,485 and $986 for legal expenses and office                 
          expenses, respectively.  Petitioner conceded that she had                   
          unreported Schedule C income of $433, and that she is not                   
          entitled to a $20 Schedule C deduction for dues and publications,           
          or a $403 Schedule C deduction for insurance.                               
          The parties agree that, due to the increase in petitioner's                 
          adjusted gross income, petitioner's claimed general sales tax               
          deduction and child and dependent care credit must be                       
          mathematically adjusted.  The parties can make these adjustments            
          in their Rule 155 computations.                                             
          2  All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in               
          effect for the taxable year in issue, and all Rule references are           
          to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless                    
          otherwise indicated.                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011