Duane B. and Linda L. Erwin, et al. - Page 12

                                                 - 12 -                                                    
            legalistic gibberish.  Based on well established law,                                          
            petitioners' position is frivolous and groundless.                                             
                  We are also convinced that petitioners instituted and                                    
            maintained this proceeding primarily, if not exclusively, for                                  
            purposes of delay.  Having to deal with this matter wasted the                                 
            Court's time, as well as respondent's.  Moreover, taxpayers with                               
            genuine controversies were delayed.                                                            
                  In view of the foregoing, we will exercise our discretion                                
            under section 6673(a)(1) and in our decision in docket No.                                     
            8625-95 require each petitioner to pay a penalty to the United                                 
            States in the amount of $1,500.  Coleman v. Commissioner, supra                                
            at 71-72; Crain v. Commissioner, supra at 1417-1418; Coulter v.                                
            Commissioner, 82 T.C. 580, 584-586 (1984); Abrams v.                                           
            Commissioner, supra at 408-411.                                                                
                  To reflect the foregoing,                                                                


                                                        Orders of dismissal and                            
                                                  decisions will be entered in                             
                                                  each case.                                               














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  

Last modified: May 25, 2011