- 156 -
iate Standard Chartered Bank HK had a source (viz., the Merit
$570,000 deposit) for the UB $570,000 pre-March 1984 loan and
(2) through its affiliate Standard Chartered Bank, Singapore, had
a source (viz., the Forward $570,000 deposit) for the UB $570,000
renewed loan that it funded. We are also satisfied from that re-
cord that (1) Standard Chartered Bank HK through its affiliate
Union Bank had a source (viz., the interest paid by BOT to Union
Bank on the UB $570,000 pre-March 1984 loan) for the interest it
presumably paid on the Merit $570,000 deposit and (2) Standard
Chartered Bank, Singapore, through its affiliate Union Bank had a
source (viz., the interest paid by BOT to Union Bank on the UB
$570,000 renewed loan) for the interest it presumably paid on the
Forward $570,000 deposit. Moreover, Union Bank (1) through its
affiliate Standard Chartered Bank HK had an inflow of funds
(viz., the Merit $570,000 deposit) that was sufficient to cover
its outflow of funds for the UB $570,000 pre-March 1984 loan to
BOT and (2) through its affiliate Standard Chartered Bank,
Singapore, had an inflow of funds (viz., the Forward $570,000
deposit) that was sufficient to cover its outflow of funds to
renew the UB $570,000 renewed loan to BOT. In addition,
(1) Standard Chartered Bank HK through its affiliate Union Bank
had an inflow of funds (viz., the interest paid by BOT to Union
Bank on the UB $570,000 pre-March 1984 loan) that was sufficient
to cover its outflow of funds for the interest presumably paid on
Page: Previous 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011