Thomas L. Hobart - Page 6

                                                  - 6 -                                                    
            convictions.  Summary judgment was entered in favor of Zebrowski                               
            on March 2, 1993.                                                                              
                  Petitioner's 1988 Federal income tax return was filed on                                 
            July 19, 1991.  Petitioner filed in 1988 using single status but                               
            has since conceded that his filing status should have been                                     
            married.  Petitioner reported income of $31,400 from wages,                                    
            salaries, tips, etc., on his return, as well as $218 of taxable                                
            interest income.  Petitioner did not include any of the funds he                               
            had misappropriated from Zebrowski in his income reported for                                  
            1988.                                                                                          
                  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) began an investigation of                             
            petitioner during 1992.  Petitioner failed to provide any income                               
            records other than four or five bank statements and a copy of a                                
            tax return in response to IRS document requests.                                               

                                                 OPINION                                                   
            Unreported Income                                                                              
                  Respondent has argued that the doctrine of collateral                                    
            estoppel bars petitioner from denying the receipt and the amount                               
            of unreported income set forth in the notice of deficiency.                                    
            Because of the lack of identity of issues and uncertainty of when                              
            the misappropriated amounts determined in the prior litigation                                 
            were taken, the application of collateral estoppel in this case                                
            is problematic.  Detailed analysis of that issue is less                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011