Deborah Lynn Israel - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 1990                
          Federal income tax in the amount of $5,285 and an accuracy-                 
          related penalty in the amount of $1,012.                                    
               After concessions by respondent,2 the sole issue for                   
          decision is whether $13,808 of rental payments paid by                      
          petitioner's former spouse pursuant to the terms of a separation            
          agreement constitute taxable alimony under section 71.                      
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and attached exhibits are incorporated             
          herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in New York, New              
          York, on the date the petition was filed in this case.                      
               Petitioner and her former spouse, Dr. Israel, were married             
          on June 28, 1970, and one son was born of their marriage.                   
          Marital difficulties arose and petitioner and Dr. Israel                    
          ultimately separated.                                                       
               On June 10, 1987, petitioner and Dr. Israel entered into a             
          separation agreement.  Article III of the separation agreement              
          labeled "Maintenance" in pertinent part stated as follows:                  
                    a.  [Dr. Israel] agrees to pay, and [petitioner] agrees           
               to accept the sum of one hundred fifty ($150.00) dollars per           
               week as and for maintenance (alimony). Same shall be due and           
               payable the first Friday after the execution of this                   
               agreement, and shall continue to [be] payable until the                
               earliest of the following:                                             


          2         Respondent conceded that the amount in issue is                   
          $13,808, that petitioner is entitled to claim head of household             
          filing status, and that petitioner is not liable for the                    
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011