Rolf Kirsch - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          an addition to tax under section 6651 in the amount of $1,866.              
          Petitioner resided in Auburn, California, when he timely filed              
          his petition.                                                               
               Following a concession,2 the issues are whether petitioner             
          (1) may deduct certain "away from home" and car and truck                   
          expenses as trade or business expenses, (2) may deduct on                   
          Schedule C certain "draws" paid to him by his business, (3) may             
          deduct health insurance premiums on Schedule C, and (4) is liable           
          for an addition to tax under section 6651 for filing his return             
          late.                                                                       
               The facts may be summarized as follows.  Petitioner operated           
          a machine shop, Kirsch Machine Shop, as a sole proprietorship in            
          Santa Clara, California, from 1968 until 1990.  In 1988                     
          petitioner sold his home in the Santa Clara area and moved his              
          family to Auburn, California--approximately 140 miles away from             
          the machine shop.  The reason for the move was that the quality             
          of life was thought to be better in Auburn.                                 
               During 1989, petitioner spent weeknights in motels in Santa            
          Clara and drove back to Auburn on weekends.  Petitioner also                
          performed an unspecified amount of driving for his business                 
          during the week.  Petitioner withdrew $28,175 from his machine              
          shop business during 1989 to provide himself a salary (draw), and           
          paid $3,937 for health insurance in that year.                              

          2    Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to use the             
          filing status of married filing separately.                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011