- 9 - damaged, or unusually soiled, nor does it have any unusual markings or imprints that might suggest that it was lost or delayed prior to being delivered to the Court. Moreover, petitioner's belief that the envelope bearing the petition may have been erroneously processed as third class mail is not supported by any evidence in the record. Consistent with the foregoing, petitioner cannot avail himself of the relief provided in section 7502. Because his petition was not timely filed under section 6213(a) or section 7502, respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction will be granted.4 To give effect to the foregoing, An order granting respondent's motion and dismissing this case for lack of jurisdiction will be entered. 4 Although petitioner cannot pursue his case in this Court, he is not without a judicial remedy. Specifically, he may pay the tax, file a claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service, and, if his claim is denied, sue for a refund in the appropriate Federal District Court or the United States Court of Federal Claims. McCormick v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 138, 142 (1970).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: May 25, 2011