- 5 -
respondent spoke with petitioner who restated her intent to mail
the needed substantiation material to respondent.
On May 18, 1994, respondent mailed to petitioners, by
certified and regular mail, a proposed joint status report along
with a letter informing petitioners of respondent's intent to
file a motion to dismiss if adequate substantiation were not
received by June 15, 1994. Petitioner signed the return receipt
for the certified letter on May 23, 1994, but took no action in
response to the letter.
Thereafter, on June 20, 1994, respondent filed her motion
to dismiss for failure to properly prosecute. By order of June
22, 1994, this Court ordered that the case be calendared for a
hearing on respondent's motion to dismiss on July 12, 1994.
The case was called on July 12, 1994. There was no
appearance by or on behalf of petitioners. Petitioners did not
submit to the Court a written statement of their position nor did
they submit any supporting documents. Respondent had, by that
time, made three additional attempts to resolve the case. On
June 14, 1994, respondent sent petitioners a certified letter
informing them of her intention to file a motion to dismiss for
failure to properly prosecute. In this letter, respondent
indicated that, should the needed substantiation documents be
received, she would withdraw the motion. No documents were
received from petitioner. On June 24, 1994, respondent spoke
with petitioner on the phone. Petitioner indicated that she had,
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011