Estate of Doris L. Rickman, Deceased, Doris K. Rickman, Executrix - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         

          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-429.  Simply stated, the rule set             
          forth in Scar v. Commissioner, supra, applies in the narrow set             
          of circumstances where the notice of deficiency on its face                 
          reveals that respondent failed to make a determination.                     
          The following excerpt from Kantor v. Commissioner, supra,                   
          reflects the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's view of the           
          applicability of Scar.                                                      
                    Before issuing a notice of deficiency pursuant to                 
               26 U.S.C. [sec.] 6212(a), the Commissioner must make an                
               actual determination of the taxpayer's liability.                      
               Scar, 814 F.2d at 1370.  As a general rule, however, we                
               will not "look behind a deficiency notice to question                  
               the Commissioner's motives and procedures leading to a                 
               determination."  Id. at 1368.                                          
                    We recognized an exception to this rule in Scar,                  
               where the notice of deficiency revealed on its face                    
               that a determination had not been made using the                       
               taxpayer's return.  Id.  * * *                                         
                    We later emphasized in Clapp v. Commissioner,                     
               however, that the kind of review exercised in Scar is                  
               applicable "[o]nly where the notice of deficiency                      
               reveals on its face that the Commissioner failed to                    
               make a determination."  875 F.2d at 1402 (emphasis                     
               added).  In Clapp, we determined that the notices of                   
               deficiency were adequate to establish jurisdiction                     
               where they indicated various adjustments to income and                 
               the fact that these adjustments were based upon the                    
               disallowance of deductions.  The taxpayers in Clapp                    
               attempted to show that the Commissioner had not made an                
               actual determination of their deficiency by introducing                
               internal IRS documents which suggested that at the time                
               the notices were issued, the IRS had not decided which                 
               legal theory it would rely upon to secure a deficiency                 
               judgment.  We nevertheless refused to question the                     
               Commissioner's determination because there was no                      
               indication on the face of the notices that a                           
               determination had not been made.  Id. at 1400-01.  The                 
               disallowed deductions did not refer to unrelated                       
               entities, nor had the tax rate been arbitrarily set.                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011