Spyglass Partners, Richard E. Shea, Tax Matters Partner, et al. - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          condominiums and the return of that income in accordance with a             
          request from Western Savings' legal counsel.  On approximately              
          June 15, 1984, Derrick and other individuals formed SK Management           
          Co. (SK) to manage the condominiums, and, by letter dated June              
          15, 1984, the prior management company acknowledged receipt of              
          the letter and agreed that SK would take over the condominium               
          management.  The partnerships also engaged an accountant to                 
          review the records of the former management company, and, in                
          September 1984, the accountant provided some financial data                 
          regarding the period of operations from December 27, 1983,                  
          through May 31, 1984.                                                       
               During May and June 1984, the partnerships and sellers                 
          entered into separate identical, formal agreements or contracts             
          (May agreements) for the sale of each condominium.  These                   
          superseding agreements did not change the basic obligations of              
          the December agreement. The May agreements merely provided                  
          additional detail with which to carry out the intent of the                 
          December agreements.  The May agreements, although executed in              
          May or June 1984, were dated as of the December 1983 date which             
          corresponded to the December agreements. The May agreements                 
          provided for the same July 2, 1984, settlement date, and, in                
          accordance with the December agreements, recited that the                   
          partnerships were entitled to possession of the condominiums, as            
          well as all of the benefits and burdens of ownership.                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011