Spyglass Partners, Richard E. Shea, Tax Matters Partner, et al. - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         

          insurance agency to inspect the condominiums in connection with             
          the purchase of liability and casualty insurance, and an                    
          insurance binder was executed.  Finally, from the time of the               
          December 1983 agreements, Derrick was generally the overseer of             
          the management companies that collected rents, advertised for               
          rentals, paid expenses, and handled the day-to-day condominium              
          operations.  Possession of the condominiums by the partnerships             
          or buyers was possible, and it was exercised by and through a               
          general partner, Derrick.                                                   
               Payment of the Property Tax.  There was no reference to real           
          property tax in the December 1983 agreements.  In the May 1984              
          agreements (executed in May 1984, which related back to the                 
          December 1983 agreements), the real property taxes were to be               
          prorated between the buyers and sellers as of the December 1983             
          execution date.  On this point, respondent argues that the May              
          1984 agreements may be the documents which created sufficient               
          enforceable obligations to constitute a sale, rather than an                
          option, for Federal tax purposes.8  Petitioners, however, counter           
          that the May 1984 documents were drafted solely to modify the               
          December 1983 agreements.  In that regard, petitioners contend              
          that the December 1983 agreements constituted a completed sale              
          and that the May 1984 documents simply added details to carrying            

               8Respondent argued that the sale may have occurred either at           
          the time of executing the May 1984 agreements or at the time of             
          the subsequent closing or settlement date, but that in either               
          event petitioners would not have met the 6-month threshold of               
          sec. 483.                                                                   


Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011