Spencer M. and Suzanne J. Stillman - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

          standing to contest these proceedings.  The Court set the motion for a hearing
          in which Mr. Stillman was permitted to participate.  Although Mr. Stillman's
          evidence was accepted for what it was worth, this Court generally gives little
          weight to a taxpayer's opposition to the spouse's entitlement to innocent   
          spouse relief.  See Garvey v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-354; Estate of  
          Ravetti v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-45.  Respondent, on brief, argued  
          against granting the Motion for Leave.                                      
               We defined "fraud on the court" in Abatti v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 1319,
          1325 (1986), affd. 859 F.2d 115 (9th Cir.1988), as follows:                 
               "Fraud on the court is "only that species of fraud which does, or      
               attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by     
               officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not           
               perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjud[g]ing          
               cases that are presented for adjudication.  Fraud, inter partes,       
               without more, should not be a fraud upon the court * * *" Toscano      
               v. Commissioner, 441 F.2d at 933, quoting 7 J. Moore, Federal          
               Practice, par. 60.33 (2d ed. 1970).  To prove such fraud, the          
               petitioners must show that an intentional plan of deception            
               designed to improperly influence the Court in its decision has had     
               such an effect on the Court. * * * [Citations omitted.]"               
               The burden is on the moving party to show such fraud by clear and      
          convincing evidence.  Kraasch v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 623, 626 (1978);     
          Spielberger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-444.  Gross neglect on the part
          of taxpayer's counsel does not constitute fraud on the Court.  Kenner v.    
          Commissioner, 387 F.2d 689 (7th Cir. 1968).                                 
               In our opinion petitioner has failed to establish that a fraud was     
          perpetrated on this Court.  While it is true that petitioner did not receive a
          copy of the MAR Memorandum, it does not follow that receipt by her of that  
          document would have made any difference.  During that time frame, petitioner
          was mainly concerned with the welfare of her son and paid little attention to
          the various materials sent to her by her lawyers.  Thus, we conclude that she
          either knew or should have known about the innocent spouse defense because of
          the ongoing negotiations between 1986 and 1990 related to her divorce and the







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011