- 25 -
have been able to enforce a constructive trust against
my estate, I would think.
Q the kids meaning --
A Being the Parker children.
Q Yes.
A And Larry, to the extent he had any interest --
Q Yes.
A -- against my estate, if my estate tried to claim
the entire property through those agreements or
contracts that I acquired from Marty Nathan.
And so, I felt that I held the bare legal title to
this entity, the land and then the ultimate entity, and
held it subject to the Parker children's ownership, and
Larry Parker's rights.
Larry Parker having $2.5 million, and the children
having an interest in this joint venture we were
putting together.
Q The concept, trust, here, had no meaning beyond
that?
A I didn't think of it as that. I am holding title
for the kids. I am just holding title. And that is my
feeling.
Bradish further testified about the period from January 1980
until March 1981, when the Bradish group interest was sold and
the $2 million notes were received. He testified that he acted
independently of Parker. He testified that he was looking out
for the best interests of the daughters and himself. He
testified that, "absolutely", he had the authority to act
independently of Parker. We found Bradish to be a credible
witness. We find that he acted independently of Parker. We
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011