Windsor Production Corporation - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          Pierce v. Underwood, supra at 564-565; Powers v. Commissioner,              
          supra at 473.                                                               
          The fact that the Commissioner eventually loses or concedes                 
          the case does not in itself establish that a position is                    
          unreasonable.  Wilfong v. United States, 991 F.2d 359, 364 (7th             
          Cir. 1993); Hanson v. Commissioner, 975 F.2d 1150, 1153 (5th Cir.           
          1992), revg. an unpublished Order of this Court.  However, it is            
          a factor to be considered.  Heasley v. Commissioner, 967 F.2d               
          116, 120 (5th Cir. 1992), affg. in part and revg. in part T.C.              
          Memo. 1991-189; Estate of Perry v. Commissioner, 931 F.2d 1044,             
          1046 (5th Cir. 1991); Powers v. Commissioner, supra at 471.                 
          The taxpayer need not show bad faith to establish that the                  
          Commissioner's position was not substantially justified for                 
          purposes of a motion for litigation costs under section 7430.               
          Estate of Perry v. Commissioner, supra; Powers v. Commissioner,             
          supra.                                                                      
              b.    Respondent's Claimed Basis in Fact                                
              A taxpayer is liable for accumulated earnings tax if it is              
          formed or availed of to avoid income tax for its shareholders by            
          permitting earnings and profits to accumulate instead of being              
          divided or distributed.  Sec. 532(a), Hughes, Inc. v.                       
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 1, 15 (1988).  The most important factor              
          in deciding if the accumulated earnings tax applies is whether              
          a corporation accumulated earnings and profits beyond the                   
          reasonable needs of the business.  United States v. Donruss Co.,            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011