- 5 - If petitioner had not transferred to the Pension System but rather had remained a member of the Retirement System, he would have been entitled to retire and receive a normal service retirement benefit, including a regular monthly annuity. He would not, however, have been entitled to receive a transfer refund because a transfer refund is only payable to those who elect to transfer from the Retirement System to the Pension System. As a member of the Pension System, petitioner receives a retirement benefit based upon his salary and his creditable years of service, specifically including those years of creditable service recognized under the Retirement System. However, due to petitioner's receipt of the Transfer Refund, petitioner's monthly annuity is less than the monthly annuity he would have received if he had not transferred to the Pension System but had retired under the Retirement System. The Transfer Refund was mailed, in the form of a check, to T. Rowe Price, a mutual fund in Baltimore, Maryland, and deposited into an IRA account in petitioner's name in accord with a Limited Power of Attorney for Bank to Accept Deposit of Refund Check. On their Federal income tax return for 1989, petitioners did not report any part of the Transfer Refund as income. In the 6(...continued) deficiency, however, this total is shown as $184,787.54.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011