- 42 - T.C. Memo. 1995-297; Boecking v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-497. We conclude that the annual net increase each year in the outstanding debit balance of the YOC-Elvin Account is to be treated as a constructive dividend to Elvin. Respondent gave Elvin credit for all repayments reflected in the YOC-Elvin Account during the years in issue. We agree with respondent's determination of the amount of constructive dividends charged to Elvin. We conclude and hold that Elvin received from YOC constructive dividend income for 1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986 of $137,673, $17,510, $64,825, and $258,939 (the taxable portion of which for 1986 is limited to $196,042 as a result of YOC's 1986 earnings and profits), respectively, relating to the annual net increase in the YOC-Elvin Account. The Yacht Capriole -- Claimed Business Expenses and Constructive Dividends Petitioners note that title to the Capriole was held in the name of YOC, and petitioners argue that Elvin entertained business associates and potential customers on the Capriole, that business discussions with YOC employees were conducted on the Capriole, that the Capriole was used a majority of the time for business, and that YOC did not attempt to sell the Capriole because YOC expected to make a profit in later years on appreciation of the Capriole. Elvin is to be treated as owner of the Capriole. Elvin purchased and used the Capriole solely for personal use. DuringPage: Previous 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011