- 8 - Thus, we are satisfied that the additions to tax for fraud for the years in issue should be sustained by the entry of a default against petitioner pursuant to Rule 123(a).5 To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued, and decision will be entered for respondent. 5 We are mindful of the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, to which an appeal of this case would lie, in Estate of Spear v. Commissioner, 41 F.3d 103 (3d Cir. 1994), revg. T.C. Memo. 1993-213. However, the situation in Estate of Spear and that of this case are wholly dissimilar. Petitioner has simply failed to participate in the preparation for, or trial of, his case before us.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011