- 6 - from 1978 to 1984 are in status 12 which indicates they are closed and satisfied." Discussion Having conceded the accuracy of respondent's adjustments, petitioners bear the burden of establishing their claim that the issues in this case have been previously settled with respondent. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). That task is exceedingly difficult here since none of petitioners' tax returns for any of the years involved nor a complete copy of the statutory notice of deficiency is in evidence. The partnership settlement agreements Petitioners' evidence and argument that the issues in this case have been settled is answered by a statement made in Maxwell v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 783, 787 (1986). There the Court said: "This case presents the dichotomy between, on the one hand, the procedures applicable to the determination and redetermination of deficiencies and, on the other hand, the procedures applicable to the administrative adjustment and judicial readjustment of partnership items." (Emphasis in original). As is described in further detail in Maxwell, prior to the enactment of special partnership audit and litigation procedures, any deficiency determination involving the income, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership was made for each partner along with all other items on the partner's individual FederalPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011