Evelyn R. Ambrose - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

                                       OPINION                                        
               We consider here whether certain payments pursuant to a                
          temporary order are to be treated as alimony.  The temporary                
          order and subsequent related documents contain a single amount              
          designated solely for “family support”, followed by the judge’s             
          proposal to divide the stated amount into separately designated             
          amounts for child support and spousal support, respectively.                
          Petitioner Ms. Ambrose’s primary argument is that part of the               
          payments were "fixed", within the meaning of section 71(c)(1), as           
          child support payments and are therefore not includable in her              
          income or deductible by Mr. Ambrose.  Specifically, she asserts             
          that the temporary order for generic family support payments was            
          subsequently modified and converted to separate spousal and child           
          support payments.  Ms. Ambrose, in the alternative, argues that             
          child support payments are not terminated upon the payee’s death            
          so that the section 71(b)(1)(D) requirements are not met and,               
          hence, the payments do not constitute alimony includable in her             
          income.  Petitioner Mr. Ambrose argues that, since the temporary            
          order provides solely for family support and because the court              
          did not order separate allocations for child support or alimony,            
          he is entitled to deduct the payments.  In order to determine the           
          proper tax treatment of the payments in question, we must analyze           
          and interpret two State court orders.                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011