American Underwriters, Inc. - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          where the transferor and transferee are related.  Hardman v.                
          United States, supra at 1412.  The mere fact that the transferor            
          and the transferee are related, however, does not necessarily               
          mean that any transfer between them lacks economic substance.               
          Id.                                                                         
               Based on our careful review of the entire record, and after            
          evaluating each of the 11 factors mentioned above, we answer the            
          four questions set forth immediately above in the affirmative.              
          The record points to the conclusion that the advances were loans            
          from petitioner to Kenilworth.  Although the tangible                       
          documentation for the advances is less than complete, we conclude           
          from the record that petitioner and Kenilworth intended to create           
          a debtor-creditor relationship, that their intent was consistent            
          with the economic reality of creating a debtor-creditor                     
          relationship, that petitioner wanted Kenilworth to repay each               
          advance timely and expeditiously, that Kenilworth intended to               
          repay each advance in that manner, and that an unrelated lender             
          would have advanced funds to Kenilworth in a fashion similar to             
          that employed by petitioner.                                                
               Before setting forth our analysis of the 11 factors,                   
          we pause briefly to state our view of the relevant witnesses.               
          With respect to Mr. Roven and Ms. Martin, the two witnesses who             
          testified on behalf of petitioner, we find them to be credible in           
          their testimony that the advances were intercompany loans.                  
          Whereas respondent would have us minimize their testimony and               




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011