- 2 - I.R.C., and the regulations thereunder, including Example (3) of sec. 1.901-2(f)(2)(ii), Income Tax Regs. Held, further, there was no indirect subsidy to P with respect to E's credit practice. Held, further, the requirements of foreign tax creditability under secs. 901-908, I.R.C., have been satisfied with respect to Egyptian income taxes paid on behalf of S by E. Robert L. Moore, II, Jay L. Carlson, Emmett B. Lewis, J. Bradford Anwyll, Kevin L. Kenworthy, Laura G. Ferguson, and James J. Lenahan, for petitioner. William G. Merkle, Cynthia J. Mattson, William B. Lowrance, Paul S. Manning, Michael J. Calabrese, Jan E. Lamartine, Bettie N. Ricca, and Joan M. Thomsen, for respondent. MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION TANNENWALD, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's 1980, 1981, and 1982 Federal income taxes in the amounts of $109,618,203, $200,848,534, and $155,776,311, respectively. The issue for decision is whether petitioner is entitled, under section 901,1 to foreign tax credits for Egyptian income taxes purportedly paid or accrued for the years 1979- 1982.2 1 All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 In the petition, petitioner affirmatively claimed additional depletion deductions in the amounts of $738,084, $1,069,353, and $1,273,498, for 1980, 1981, and 1982, respectively, as well as reductions of petitioner's dividend income for 1980 and 1982 in (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011