-23- Accordingly, the adjustments respondent made in the notice of deficiency increased (decreased) petitioners' income and loss items as follows: Income Short-Term Long-Term Year (Loss) Capital Gain Capital Gain 1979 $1,763,918 ($153,437) --- 1980 68,323 860,854 ($1,414,760) The adjustment to petitioners' 1979 income results in a reduction of petitioners' net operating loss carryback to 1976 from $1,766,137 to $146,279, and an increase of $1,619,858 in taxable income for 1976. The disallowed deductions arose from Tandrill's transactions involving Treasury bill option spreads and commodity futures.17 OPINION Issue 1. Tandrill Losses The first issue for decision is whether respondent properly disallowed petitioners’ allocable share of Tandrill’s 1979 and 1980 losses pursuant to section 165(c)(2). This issue turns on whether the underlying partnership transactions were entered into primarily for profit. Petitioners have the burden of proof in this regard. Rule 142(a). 17 We note that prior to the trial in this case, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audited Mr. Illingworth’s 1978-80 tax years, disallowing loss deductions that he had claimed relating both to Tandrill’s transactions at issue herein and to other transactions involving other partnerships. The IRS determined that Tandrill’s transactions had not been entered into for profit. Mr. Illingworth ultimately accepted an IRS settlement offer based on this determination.Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011