- 5 - notice of deficiency to the taxpayer at the taxpayer's "last known address." Sec. 6212(b); Frieling v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 42, 52 (1983). If a notice of deficiency is mailed by certified or registered mail to a taxpayer at the taxpayer's last known address, it is valid even if the taxpayer does not actually receive it. King v. Commissioner, 857 F.2d 676, 679 (9th Cir. 1988), affg. 88 T.C. 1042 (1987); Yusko v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 806, 810 (1987); Frieling v. Commissioner, supra at 52. In turn, the taxpayer generally has 90 days from the date that the notice of deficiency is mailed to file a petition in this Court for a redetermination of the deficiency. Sec. 6213(a). Respondent mailed the duplicate notices of deficiency involved herein on June 16, 1994. The petition was postmarked April 21, 1995, and was filed by the Court on May 1, 1995. Given the fact that the petition was neither mailed nor filed before the expiration of the 90-day statutory period for filing a timely petition, it follows that we lack jurisdiction over the petition. Secs. 6213(a), 7502; Rule 13(a), (c); see Normac, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra. The question presented is whether the dismissal of the present case should be premised on petitioners' failure to file a timely petition under section 6213(a) or on respondent's failure to issue a valid notice of deficiency under section 6212. In this regard, petitioners contend that respondent failed to mailPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011