Carl J.D. Bauman and Margaret A. Bauman - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          incorporated herein.  At the time the petition was filed in this            
          case, petitioners resided in Anchorage, Alaska.                             
               This case is part of a group of cases identified by                    
          respondent as McIntyre-CN.  McIntyre-CN is a national litigation            
          project involving coal mining partnerships promoted by Richard              
          McIntyre (McIntyre).                                                        
               Petitioner husband (Bauman) has been employed as an attorney           
          with the same law firm (law firm) in Anchorage, Alaska, since               
          1973.  He has been a partner in that law firm since 1975.                   
               Petitioners timely filed their Federal income tax return for           
          1979.  Petitioners’ Federal income tax return for 1980 was not              
          received by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) until May 8, 1981.           
          Attached to petitioners’ return for taxable year 1980 is a brief            
          handwritten note in which Bauman explains the reason for the                
          untimely filing.  This note essentially states that confusion               
          brought about by petitioner wife’s (Mrs. Bauman) second pregnancy           
          caused the couple to overlook the filing deadline.  The note                
          concludes with the statement “it won’t happen again”.                       
          Petitioners’ Federal income tax return for 1982 was not received            
          by the IRS until June 10, 1983.  Attached to petitioners’ return            
          for taxable year 1982 is a brief typewritten note in which Bauman           
          explains the reason for the couple’s delinquent filing.  In this            
          note, Bauman principally asserts that the couple was unable to              
          satisfy their obligation to file their return by the prescribed             
          date because Bauman’s father was ill and that such illness                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011