- 150 - give effect to the requested adjustments eliminating income reported for the later years. Respondent's concession should not be affected by the fact that, while we did not determine the partnerships themselves to be shams, we have determined that their transactions were shams. Petitioners in the "Fred Bryen Promotions" series of cases who have signed "piggyback agreements" should be treated similarly. Because the transactions were shams, it follows that these petitioners did not receive taxable income from those transactions. The amounts received through the transactions that we have determined to lack economic substance or a business purpose must therefore be subtracted from the taxable income reported by those partners for the years at issue, and their partnerships' taxable income thereby reduced. See Arrowhead Mountain Getaway, Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-54. Respondent's opening brief lists those years that are open and subject to adjustment for purposes of eliminating income reported. Petitioners' reply brief asserts that respondent's list omits 2 such years. This is the sort of administrative matter that the parties should resolve during the Rule 155 process. We urge them to do so. In the same vein, Machise/Intercoastal has made another point that we believe to be correct. For the years at issue, it urges that, if it may not deduct the interest at issue, neitherPage: Previous 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011