Barry B. Bealor and Nancy L. Bealor, et al. - Page 79

                                       - 27 -                                         
               Additionally, under the Termination Agreement, MIT 80                  
          purportedly forgave MPC's unpaid late charges on the compensation           
          fee in exchange for MPC's promise to pay $301,318.95 as a                   
          "Contract Renegotiation Fee".                                               
               The purportedly scheduled date of payment of the amounts due           
          under the agreement (including the "Contract Renegotiation fee")            
          was January 1, 1992.  This was 1 day past the date upon which the           
          partnership, according to the partnership agreement, was to                 
          terminate.  Fred testified that there was an oral amendment of              
          the partnership agreement extending the life of the partnership.            
          However, the provisions of the partnership agreement relating to            
          amendments require that amendments be consented to in writing by            
          all of the partners within 20 days of the notice thereunder.                
          The Termination Agreement provided that, effective as of                    
          January 1, 1988, MIT 80 would issue an invoice to MPC in the                
          amount of $301,318.95 for the Contract Renegotiation fee.  No               
          such invoice was issued.                                                    
               In the agreement, MPC agreed to pay to MIT 80 a balance due            
          of $1,295,108.  This amount included the $301,318.95 that MPC had           
          agreed to pay in exchange for forgiveness of the late charges.              
          The MIT 80 partners' notes were accordingly marked "Paid 1-1-88".           
          The debt of $1,295,108 from MPC to MIT 80 remained outstanding              
          for several years, and was ultimately dealt with as shown infra             
          pp. 30-31.                                                                  






Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011