Barry B. Bealor and Nancy L. Bealor, et al. - Page 101

                                       - 49 -                                         
          notes, aggregating $170,000, were dated January 1, 1983.  They              
          were payable January 1, 1984.  Some of the investors paid these             
          notes with cash, while others paid by means of offsets.  Some               
          portions of these notes remain unpaid.                                      
              As with MIT 82, Bruce executed a "line-of-credit" note,                
          dated January 1, 1983, from BBPA to MIT 83, whereby BBPA could              
          borrow up to $300,000 in investor cash from MIT 83 at a 15-                 
          percent interest rate.  Of the investors' cash paid in, BBPA                
          retained $46,500, a draw on the line-of-credit note.  Pursuant to           
          the line-of-credit note, MIT 83 also endorsed, or otherwise                 
          transferred to BBPA, the $170,000 in short-term partner notes.              
               Machise executed a second line-of-credit note to BBPA, also            
          dated January 1, 1983, whereby Machise could borrow up to                   
          $180,000 of the investors' cash from BBPA.  Some $69,800 in                 
          investor cash was originally disbursed to Machise.  Machise                 
          became obligated to BBPA in this amount.                                    
               As a result, MIT 83 had a corresponding "receivable" account           
          from BBPA for $284,300, represented by its line-of-credit note              
          from BBPA.14  Another $13,669 of investors' cash went to BBPA as            


          14This amount consisted of the $46,500 of investor cash BBPA                
          retained, plus the $69,800 given to Machise, plus $168,000 in               
          short-term investor notes owed by BBPA in lieu of the unpaid cash           
          required of the eight investors.  The difference between the                
          $170,000 figure for the short-term notes and $168,000 reflects a            
          correction with respect to deposits.  The cash paid out exceeds             
          the amounts of cash stipulated as having been paid in during                
          1983.  The difference of $2,559 is not explained; it may have               
          come from interest payments or from additional payments on the              
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011