Allan J. and Brenda Becker - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         
          Commissioner, 102 T.C. 596, 612 (1994).                                     
               Section 6653(a) for 1979 and section 6653(a)(1) for 1981 and           
          1982 impose an addition to tax equal to 5 percent of the                    
          underpayment if any part of an underpayment of tax is due to                
          negligence or intentional disregard of rules or regulations.                
          Section 6653(a)(2) imposes an addition to tax equal to 50 percent           
          of the interest payable with respect to the portion of the                  
          underpayment attributable to negligence or intentional disregard            
          of rules or regulations.                                                    
               Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise the due               
          care that a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would employ           
          under the circumstances.  Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947           
          (1985).  The question is whether a particular taxpayer's actions            
          in connection with the transactions were reasonable in light of             
          his experience and the nature of the investment or business.  See           
          Henry Schwartz Corp. v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 728, 740 (1973).              
          When considering the negligence addition to tax, we evaluate the            
          particular facts of each case, judging the relative                         
          sophistication of the taxpayers, as well as the manner in which             
          they approached their investment.  McPike v. Commissioner, T.C.             
          Memo. 1996-46.  Compare Spears v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-            
          341, with Zidanich v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-382.                    
               In the present case, petitioner contends that he reasonably            
          relied upon the advice of a qualified adviser, Stuart Becker.  A            
          taxpayer may avoid liability for the additions to tax under the             




Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011