2 All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, except as otherwise noted. Petitioners W. C. and Linda R. Benson, husband and wife, filed joint income tax returns for the calendar years 1990 and 1991. At the time the petition herein was filed, petitioners were residents of Memphis, Tennessee. By stipulation, petitioners agreed to the adjustment made by respondent to petitioners' income for 1990 and 1991 on account of income from pension and profit-sharing plans in the respective amounts of $2,250 and $6,250. The parties also agreed that petitioners are entitled to an additional deduction for car and truck repairs and maintenance expenses in the amount of $550.12 in 1991, over that which was allowed by respondent. In all other respects, respondent has made no concessions with regard to the propriety of the statutory notice issued to petitioners nor of the issues herein. Except as otherwise provided by statute or by Rule of this Court, the burden of proof is on petitioner to demonstrate that respondent's determination was in error and, if necessary, the amount thereof. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933). Except for the concessions that the parties have agreed to, mentioned above, there is no evidence in this record from which the Court can conclude that respondent erred in any respectPage: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011