Alice Berger, et al. - Page 54

                                       - 54 -                                         
                (2) a former spouse, but only if the transfer is                      
               incident to the divorce.                                               
          Section 1041 is effective generally for transfers after July 18,            
          1984, in taxable years ending after such date; see DEFRA sec.               
          421(d), 98 Stat. 795.                                                       
               Prior to the enactment of section 1041, the resolution of              
          property rights incident to a divorce gave rise to differing tax            
          results, depending on how each spouse's rights and obligations              
          were viewed for State law purposes.  The Supreme Court had ruled            
          that a transfer of separately owned appreciated property to a               
          spouse (or former spouse) in exchange for the release of marital            
          claims resulted in the recognition of gain to the transferor.               
          United States v. Davis, 370 U.S. 65 (1962).  However, upon an               
          approximately equal division of community property on divorce, no           
          gain was recognized on the theory that there was only a                     
          nontaxable partition, not a sale or exchange.  Carrieres v.                 
          Commissioner, 64 T.C. 959, 964 (1975), affd. per curiam 552 F.2d            
          1350 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Siewert v. Commissioner, 72 T.C.             
          326, 332-333 (1979).  The Commissioner applied a like result to             
          the partition of jointly held property.  See Rev. Rul. 74-347,              
          1974-2 C.B. 26.  The tax treatment of divisions of property                 
          between spouses involving other various types of ownership under            
          the different State laws was often unclear and resulted in much             
          litigation.  See H. Rept. 98-432 (Part 2), at 1491 (1984).                  
          Several common law States had tried to avoid the result in the              
          Davis case by amending and bending their property and equitable             




Page:  Previous  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011