Arun and Asmita Bhatia - Page 9

                                          9                                           
          shareholder in two S corporations, A & L and Hennessey.  In late            
          1979, the taxpayer assumed the liability of A & L to Hennessey.             
          A & L's books were adjusted with a debit to accounts payable and            
          a credit to notes payable.  Hennessey's books were adjusted with            
          a debit to the taxpayer's drawing account and a credit to                   
          accounts receivable.  At the end of the year, the taxpayer's                
          drawing account was closed by debiting the taxpayer's                       
          undistributed taxable income account in an amount including the             
          amount of the debt assumed.  We concluded that the charge to the            
          taxpayer's drawing account was not an actual economic outlay                
          stating:                                                                    
               [The taxpayer's] bookkeeping maneuvers merely shifted,                 
               on paper, the liability for prior loans.  Hennessey's                  
               debit to * * * [the taxpayer's] drawing account, and                   
               its subsequent credit to that account and debit to * *                 
               * [the taxpayer's] undistributed taxable income                        
               account, do not reflect a current economic outlay                      
               entitling * * * [the taxpayer] to increase his basis in                
               A & L.  Although the entries in Hennessey's books                      
               technically reduced * * * [the taxpayer's] book equity,                
               such entries could not, absent liquidation of                          
               Hennessey, leave * * * [the taxpayer] "poorer in a                     
               material sense." * * * [Shebester v. Commissioner,                     
               supra; citation omitted.4]                                             
               Petitioners' reliance on Rev. Rul. 75-144, 1975-1 C.B. 277,            
          is misplaced.  The Court of Appeals in Underwood v. Commissioner,           
          535 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1976), gave the ruling short shrift as               
          applied to situations such as is involved herein stating:                   



          4  We took the same view in Wilson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.              
          1991-544, and Burnstein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-74.                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011