- 8 - fact that Mr. Brown undertook to litigate his claim against Ms. Lotts indicates that he had a reasonable prospect of recovery as of the end of 1993. The fact that the lawsuit was not actually filed until 1994 does not negate the inference that there was a recoverable claim for reimbursement during 1993. Dawn v. Commissioner, 675 F.2d 1077, 1078 (9th Cir. 1982), affg. T.C. Memo. 1979-479; see National Home Prods., Inc. v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 501, 525-526 (1979). Moreover, even if Mr. Brown established that there was a closed and completed transaction giving rise to a deductible theft loss, he has failed to establish the fair market value of the property stolen. The amount of a theft loss is equal to the lesser of (1) the fair market value, or (2) the adjusted cost basis of the property stolen. Sec. 1.165-7(b), 8(c), Income Tax Regs. The regulations further require that the fair market value be ascertained by competent appraisal. Sec. 1.165-7(a)(2), Income Tax Regs. Therefore, we sustain respondent’s disallowance of Mr. Brown’s claimed theft loss.4 Finally, we must determine whether Mr. Brown is liable for the self-employment tax under section 1401. Section 1401(a) imposes a tax on the self-employment income of every individual. 4Similar to Mr. Brown’s recovery of his deposit in 1994, Mr. Brown reported the recovery of his vehicle in the amount of $3,000 in 1995. Thus, we note that Mr. Brown overreported his taxable income in 1995 and may be entitled to a refund for that year.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011