- 12 - examination of petitioner's books and records occurred in this case, we conclude that petitioner never timely objected thereto, and petitioner thereby waived his rights under section 7605(b). Relying on United States v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1977) and United States v. Grunewald, 987 F.2d 531 (8th Cir. 1993), petitioner argues that respondent’s revenue agent unduly delayed in making the fraud referral to respondent’s Criminal Investigation Division, that petitioner's Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights were thereby violated, and that the fraud additions to tax should be rejected. We disagree. Respondent’s continued investigation of petitioner after the revenue agent initially suspected fraud did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. See United States v. Grunewald, supra. There is no credible evidence in the record that would support a finding that respondent’s revenue agent improperly received information as a result of any misrepresentations or improper conduct by the revenue agent. Based on the evidence before us, we conclude that petitioner fraudulently underreported his Federal income taxes for 1986 and 1987 and that petitioner is liable for the fraud additions to tax for 1986 and 1987. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: May 25, 2011