Benjamin and Sallie Campfield - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          List Account for November 29, 1986, reveals that petitioner                 
          purchased casino chips in the amounts of $1,000, $1,700, $2,100,            
          $800, $300, $1,800 and $3,000, which corresponds with the $10,700           
          shown on the CTR for that date.  Thus, the dollar figures on the            
          List Account for May 19, 1985, and November 29, 1986, corroborate           
          the dollar figures shown on the CTR's filed by Tropworld.                   
               Petitioner does not dispute the evidence presented by                  
          respondent concerning the purchase of the casino chips on May 19,           
          1985, and November 29, 1986.  Petitioners argues that respondent            
          had a duty to obtain records from Tropworld that would reveal               
          petitioner's gambling winnings during 1982 and 1983 and that, by            
          failing to do so, respondent's opening cash on hand figure is               
          fatally flawed.  This argument is without merit.  Respondent need           
          only establish, with reasonable certainty, petitioners' net worth           
          as of January 1, 1984.  Any gambling winnings from 1982 and 1983            
          will be taken into account in the net worth calculations.                   
          Petitioners reported no gambling winnings on any tax returns                
          filed for the years 1982 through 1986.                                      
               We find that petitioner incurred nondeductible expenditures            
          of $13,100 on May 19, 1985, and $10,700 on November 29, 1986, for           
          the purchase of casino chips at Tropworld.                                  
               We conclude that respondent's net worth computations meet              
          the first prong of the test in Holland v. United States, 348 U.S.           








Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011