Salvador Chavarria and Irene Chavarria - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          fraction of a month during which the failure to file continues,             
          not to exceed a maximum of 25 percent.  Sec. 6651(a)(1).                    
               “Willful neglect” has been interpreted to mean a conscious,            
          intentional failure or reckless indifference.  United States v.             
          Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 245-246 (1985).  “Reasonable cause” requires           
          the taxpayers to demonstrate that they exercised ordinary                   
          business care and prudence and were nonetheless unable to file a            
          return within the prescribed time.  Id. at 246; sec. 301.6651-              
          1(c)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.                                             
               Petitioners bear the burden of proving that respondent’s               
          determination is incorrect.  Rule 142(a); Cluck v. Commissioner,            
          105 T.C. 324, 339 (1995).  Petitioners failed to offer any                  
          evidence or explanation regarding the late filing of their 1990             
          and 1992 returns.  Thus, respondent’s determination that                    
          petitioners are liable for the section 6651(a)(1) addition to tax           
          for 1990 and 1992 will be sustained.                                        
               To reflect the foregoing and a concession by respondent,               
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  

Last modified: May 25, 2011