The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago and Subsidiaries - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         

          Tax Regs. (applying sec. 31112 to distributions to shareholders             
          made by reason of the corporation-shareholder relationship and              
          not to transactions between a corporation and a shareholder in              
          his capacity as debtor, creditor, employee, or vendee, where the            
          fact that the distributee is a shareholder is incidental to the             
          transaction).  Here the characterization issue is complicated by            
          the fact that the payors of the transfer fees become both equity            
          owners of petitioner and its primary customers, and that, by                
          becoming members, the payors of the transfer fees become entitled           
          to use the trading facilities of the exchange.                              
               CBOT members’ use of petitioner’s trading facilities does              
          not prevent the transfer fees from being contributions to                   
          capital.  A payment by a member-owner of an organization can be a           
          contribution to capital even where the member-owners receive                
          goods or services from the corporation.  See Concord Village,               
          Inc. v. Commissioner, supra (payments by members to a cooperative           
          housing corporation to fund a replacement reserve held to be                
          contributions to capital, even though members also leased                   
          property from the corporation); Minnequa Univ. Club v.                      
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1971-305 (payments by members to an                

          12  The general nonrecognition rule of sec. 311(a), as                      
          interpreted by this regulation, was repealed as part of the                 
          fairly comprehensive repeal by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub.L.           
          99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, of the statutory enactments of General              
          Utils. & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935).  The              
          regulation was removed from the regulations in 1993 by T.D. 8474,           
          1993-1 C.B. 242.                                                            




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011