James Luther Cochrane - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Petitioner's remaining answers were evasive and                        
          unresponsive, as illustrated by the following examples:                     
               (1) In request for admission (request) 1, respondent                   
          asserted that during the years in issue, petitioner worked as an            
          engineering technician for General Dynamics Corp. and Rohr                  
          Industries, Inc., in San Diego and Chula Vista, California,                 
          respectively.  In petitioner's response, he stated that he                  

               is without knowledge or information sufficient to form                 
               a belief as to the truth of respondent's allegations.                  
               Respondent has not identified the term "employed" to be                
               defined within the subject matter or scope of any                      
               statute and implementing regulation.                                   
                    In further reply, Petitioner had no contract of                   
               employment with either General Dynamics Corporation or                 
               Rohr Industries.                                                       

               (2) In request 3, respondent asserted that petitioner                  
          resided at 1655 Oleander Avenue, Chula Vista, California, during            
          the years in issue.  In response, petitioner stated that he "is             
          without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as             
          to the truth of respondent's allegations. * * * [R]espondent has            
          not defined 'residing' under a statute or section of a statute              
          and its implementing regulations."                                          
               (3) In request 5, respondent asserted that petitioner did              
          not reside outside the United States at any time during the years           
          in issue.  In response, petitioner again stated that he lacked              
          sufficient information to answer.  In addition, he stated that              
          "respondent does not cite any statute * * * defining 'reside' or            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011